They argued the liberal and conservative points of view, respectively.To assist viewers at home in finding a stance on the issue at hand, “The opening two minutes should present enough hard, specific facts so that the viewer feels he has his ‘feet on the ground.’"When the experts disagreed, Roger felt that the viewer should be armed with enough information to be persuadable, rather than just confused. He said that he wanted the viewers to focus on the issues and not just cheer on their favorite advocate, who might be presenting a case they agreed with one week, and then another case they might not, the next.Below is a clip from the Methadone show emphasizing that impartiality, an explanation omitted from episodes in subsequent seasons as the advocates on the show became more identified with the arguments they presented. television show, In 1969, a year after graduating from Harvard Law School, I was asked to appear on a new public television show to argue one side of an important public question. We did not know which side we would be asked to argue; it was almost a flip of the coin, in that we didn’t know if we were going to be arguing in favor of this or against that. Hoagy Carmichael had a poll of his remote audience as well, polling members before and after the show using bulky machinery that had to be moved from station to station around the country. The programs are available on the station’s Open Vault archives site. “Fisher believe[d] that all these issues could be made comprehensible to TV viewers if information were better organized to meet the layman’s needs." The moderator would also sometimes add further explanation at the start of the show to ensure that the audience was familiar with particular terms used when discussing the subject matter for debate, as again occurred with moderator Dukakis.

Governor Dukakis has been mentioned before, and Barney Frank went on to be elected to Congress. This series documents what it took to launch Women’s Advocates in the 1970’s – a team of committed people who invaded the Mayor’s office, protested police apathy, and hid families in their homes, eventually opening a shelter in a dilapidated building they called the “Women’s House.” "The show got impressive fan mail from high officials and ordinary citizens alike. Israeli lawyer Lea Tsemel is profiled in “POV: Advocate” on PBS. I was later told that my audition tape and those of a number of other prospective advocates were shown to guests at an Arizona ranch where the show’s Executive Producer, Greg Harney, was on vacation. Even though I graduated from Harvard Law School, I had not met Roger before.Roger asked me to participate in a videotaped audition by arguing about whether building a supersonic transport was worth it.

In that work, I have drawn on my own memories, as well as from some of the documentary history which is available from Roger Fisher’s personal files in the Historical and Special Collections at the Harvard Law School Library, and materials provided by WGBH.Thanks to technical assistance from WGBH and Allison Pekel, Coordinator for the Mellon Project, I have also been able to excerpt some short clips from several The episodes on the Open Vault date primarily from the later years of the program, but a few were recorded during the first season when I was with the show. "For example, I remember that during the show on expelling student disrupters, I was asked to argue in favor of automatic expulsion. Even Roger, with his framework in mind, presented his case vigorously during the civil disobedience show with no apparent willingness to concede that the choice he advocated might have some defects. Shop PBS brings you the best educational programming, series and specials, only at the PBS store online - featured at Catalogs.com. After receiving the item, contact seller withinSelect PayPal Credit at checkout to have the option to pay over time.Qualifying purchases could enjoy No Interest if paid in full in 6 months on purchases of $99 or more. The item you've selected was not added to your cart. Outside of “Sesame Street,” I don’t think there is a series in the history of PBS that so perfectly fulfilled the founding vision in … "“Evidence of the amazing impact it had on its viewers was the fact that it drew 22,000 letters a month – or 177,000 for the 40-week season – more than was received by CBS News and Walter Cronkite, over the same period... [t]hus it more than lived up to its role of involving the viewer in critical issues." We’ve been given the responsibility to air two sides of the question and we’ve learned that viewers value this objectivity above all else. "That argument was apparently persuasive, because the show was revived in 1979, and many of those shows are now on the Open Vault. During the first year I was with the show, cross-examination was not designed to discredit the witness, as often goes on in a courtroom, but was really cross-argument. Created by Harvard law professor Roger Fisher, the program evolved from "It's Up To You," a short-lived1968 Boston public TV series that featured interested citizens debating specific public policy issues. If you'd like to get the additional items you've selected to qualify for this offer, In it he said:“No other form has emerged on television which allows expert witnesses to give their testimony and then subject them to the rigor of tough cross-examination. A trained attorney presents evidence through witnesses, who are then subjected to cross-examination to reveal weak points in their memory, credibility, or evidence, or sometimes to rebuttal from witnesses who present an alternative point of view. As effective as it was, this closing argument does not include everything that Roger said. Here is Roger at work in that episode.

An Introduction to Underlying Principles and Research for Effective Literacy Instruction .