Note that para. So pervasive and convenient are Wiki articles that some academics hav… Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from freshman students to distinguished professorship, as an easily accessible tertiary source for information about anything and everything, and as a quick "ready reference", to get a sense of a concept or idea. If there are multiple headings on the page, it is also acceptable to place the subheading and then a paragraph number within that heading. When available, academic and peer-reviewed publications, scholarly monographs, and textbooks are usually the most reliable sources. Future release dates may be unreliable. Wikipedia is not a reliable source for academic writing or research. To ensure accuracy, the text of quoted material is best taken from (and cited to) the original source being quoted. Wikipedia includes articles on relatively obscure topics that might not be covered in much depth elsewhere on the Internet or at a typical library. Note that MLA style calls for both the date of publication (or its latest update) and the date on which the information was retrieved. For example, an inline qualifier might say "[Author XYZ] says....". Some sources may be considered reliable for statements as to their author's opinion, but not for statements asserted as fact. Be sure to check that older sources have not been superseded, especially if it is likely the new discoveries or developments have occurred in the last few years. ), although it is unnecessary to cite Amazon when the work itself may serve as a source for that information (e.g., authors' names and ISBNs). Information provided in passing by an otherwise reliable source that is not related to the principal topics of the publication may not be reliable; editors should cite sources focused on the topic at hand where possible. News reporting from well-established news outlets is generally considered to be reliable for statements of fact (though even the most reputable reporting sometimes contains errors). redirects here. Common sources of bias include political, financial, religious, philosophical, or other beliefs.

1). Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made in the Wikipedia article and is an appropriate source for that content. Visit Stack Exchange. Wikipedia includes articles on relatively obscure topics that might not be covered in much depth elsewhere on the Internet or at a typical library. For the policy page about citing Wikipedia within Wikipedia articles, please see For the citation-generation tool to create a citation from any article, please see It details processes or procedures of some aspect(s) of Wikipedia's norms and practices. However, newer secondary and tertiary sources may have done a better job of collecting more reports from primary sources and resolving conflicts, applying modern knowledge to correctly explain things that older sources could not have, or remaining free of bias that might affect sources written while any conflicts described were still active or strongly felt. There is an important exception to sourcing statements of fact Breaking-news reports often contain serious inaccuracies.
For such reasons such rankings are usually avoided as Wikipedia content. In general, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. I appr... Stack Exchange Network.
For the cite tool, see The following examples assume you are citing the Wikipedia article on Note that in APA 5th Edition style, the following rules apply for the reference: The goal is to reflect established views of sources as far as we can determine them.

# represents the paragraph number in the page where the information appears. It is not to be confused with "WP:PUBLISHED" redirects here. If the quoted material is more than 40 words, use the block quote format instead. The word "source" when citing sources on Wikipedia has three related meanings: The piece of work itself (the article, book) The creator of the work (the writer, journalist) The publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press) Any of the three can affect reliability. That means they cannot be used without specific consensus. Try to cite current scholarly consensus when available, recognizing that this is often absent. Many Wikipedia articles rely on scholarly material. Deprecation happens through a A deprecated source should not be used to support factual claims. APA Style requires that you provide a separate reference entry for each term you are citing in your paper because 1) you must provide a URL for each term that goes directly to the term, and 2) you must provide the publication date for each term separately. Nevertheless, some web sources are more reliable than others, and nothing illustrates this better than the phenomenal growth of Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia written by unpaid, anonymous volunteers. Other policies relevant to sourcing are The word "source" when citing sources on Wikipedia has three related meanings: All breaking-news stories, without exception, are primary sources, and must be treated with caution: see When editing a current-event article, keep in mind A small number of sources are deprecated or blacklisted on Wikipedia. If this is not possible, then the text may be taken from a reliable secondary source (ideally one that includes a citation to the original).